Global Technology Company — Madrid Protocol, Multiple Provisional Refusals
Instructed via a leading international law firm
Relative Grounds · Likelihood of Confusion · Multiple Applications
Background
A global technology company filed a series of international trademark applications designating Mongolia through the Madrid System. The Intellectual Property Office of Mongolia issued provisional refusals against multiple designations on relative grounds, citing earlier registered Mongolian marks considered similar to the applied-for marks. Among the matters handled was a refusal citing an earlier mark on grounds of similarity to the applied-for mark in respect of technology goods and services.
Our Instruction
Alimaa IP Law was instructed by a leading international law firm to review each provisional refusal, advise on prospects, and prepare substantive responses within the applicable deadlines. The instruction covered multiple applications over the course of the engagement.
Our Approach
For each refusal, we conducted a detailed comparative analysis of the applied-for mark and the cited earlier mark under Mongolian trademark law, examining visual, phonetic, and conceptual similarities. We identified and articulated the material differences between the marks in each case, including differences in overall commercial impression, structure, and meaning. Our responses set out a clear legal basis for distinguishing the marks and addressed each ground of refusal raised by the Intellectual Property Office.
Outcome
All provisional refusals were successfully overcome. Each of the international designations proceeded to full protection in Mongolia. Alimaa IP Law acted for the client across multiple applications over a period of several years.